~~~RIDDLE ME THIS~~~

[Michell From Hell]

Okay, so would you please answer a question for me?
As usual while checking my mail in my assorted profile accounts, I was inspired to ponder a point...PHOTOS...Dear Readers, if you would be so kind as to answer a few questions on this topic for me, I would most appreciate it! You may email me the answers privately, if the blog you are reading this from does not have a comment box...

We all know that profiles with photos get viewed more then those who don't. On many of the assorted sites folks feel that if their profile includes an image of their face that somehow someone from their job/straight-life/whatever will find out their "naughty secret", so they opt to use a photo of a specific part of their body instead. Seeing one of these always gets me wondering certain things:

1. Does seeing just a section of a person turn the prospective dater on more then seeing their face OR does it count against the profile owner?

2. Which body part is preferred?

A. The ass

B. The chest region

C. The feet

D. A close-up on a facial feature [ie eyes, lips, etc]

E. Their sexual organs

3. Which body part is a reason for instant rejection?

A. The ass

B. The chest region

C. The feet

D. A close-up on a facial feature [ie eyes, lips, etc]

E. Their sexual organs

4. Would you contact someone using one of these types of images or do you still prefer to see a face before you invest the energy into engaging them in conversation?

5. Would your opinion differ if the profile had a well-written biography or does that even matter?



*After collecting answers from the 17 sites I will be posting this on, I will tally up the information and post a summary of what the popular opinion shows itself to be BY WEDNESDAY of next week [the day before Thanksgiving].

Thanking you in advance for your assistance in this matter~

Lv to you all!! M

[mark spencer]

It is a question of relativity! Turning on someone is a question of stimulation, for those that say he or she must have X or Y trait physically to be aroused they clearly have a point of erotica that is a must have for them I would say a maybe 85% of people fall into this group. I could not fathom how that might effect averages for or against any particular body parts, facial or genitalia.
After taking photographs of many people for some years I have realized some people fall on the complete opposite side, NOTHING physically turns them on unless they are sure the person will accept them. Mentally they are so defensive that no matter how ideal the physique in all or any way they are hobbled by their insecurities, these are the people that have pictures taken and no matter how good they are they are NEVER satisfied, from my experience 5% of people are like this.
The last of the groups are 50/50s they like the physique for many aspects and are really turned on by the mind and great flirting or banter just as much as a key to stimulation as the physique.......................spence

[Belinda Smith]

I have a fetish so anytime I see legs in high heels....male, female or just heels...I'm there. Shared interests is a must.

[mark spencer]

I think high heels are like fashion exclamation points for great legs everything about them restates the curves and divits of the feminine form, the male equivilent is cowboy boots ..........spence

[CARL DURBIN]

mark spencer has taken photos of couples that are what i appreciate. its not so much what is exposed its whats hinted at. you see the side of a womans breast but not fully exposed. you see a part of a womans backside but not the full thing.
i love beautiful eyes.

[mark spencer]

Of the the unspoken communication the eyes say so much Ill put a new photo of a triad we shot and look at the interaction physically between the thre of them realative to the up male's eyes!

[CARL DURBIN]

i really like the triad photo. i can see the interaction of the three. this is what i enjoy in your photos.